"At the end of the day, the decision has been made, and it’s kind of in the past. Do I think it’s a good look for the sport that [Iga] Swiatek [who served a one-month suspension for an inadvertent positive test last year] and Sinner are in the final at Wimbledon after serving a ban? I don’t think it’s a good look for the sport."
"And I think people could agree. But I’m not going to sit there and talk about that [on commentary] in the final. They’ve been playing some incredible tennis. Sinner, he served a ban, which do I agree with? No. But he came back and he’s been playing some excellent tennis."
"At the moment, tennis is pretty boring, to be honest. There’s not many rivalries. I’ve watched and broken it down and been commentating on it: the level is amazing. But there’s more rivalries and more excitement on the women’s side. Raducanu vs Sabalenka was an amazing match, Anisimova vs Sabalenka, there was more bitterness and more of a rivalry in these matches than I’m seeing on the men’s side."
"We watch sport for the excitement of two people, maybe not liking each other. I think we’ve got some great personalities as well. I think [Jack] Draper going down early, [Frances] Tiafoe going down, and some of these more personality guys that went down early didn’t help."
"I’m not saying Alcaraz and Sinner need to have been in a fight or anything like that. It’s hard because the game is missing Federer and Nadal, and Djokovic has… well, he said that it’s not his last match, but I don’t know how believable that is from how I saw him physically [against Sinner]. Alcaraz and Sinner are going to be carrying the torch for the next 10 to 15 years."
Loading