Roddick Defends Nadal From 'Dumb' Criticism After Indian Wells Withdrawal
ATP
Rafael Nadal has been backed by Andy Roddick after the Spaniard was lambasted by some for withdrawing from the Indian Wells Open.
There was much excitement when Nadal had initially committed to play in Indian Wells. It was set to be his first appearance at the event since 2022, having missed the tournament with injury last year.
Many fans became even more optimistic that Nadal would be ready for the Masters 1000 event after he partook in an exhibition match for Netflix with Carlos Alcaraz, which the younger Spaniard narrowly won.
Unfortunately, Nadal withdrew from the Indian Wells Open just 24 hours before his opening match against Milos Raonic, much to the devastation of those who bought a ticket to see him play.
Some fans have denounced Nadal for choosing to play at the exhibition but then not playing at Indian Wells. However, Roddick, who once thought Nadal had false humility, does not believe this is fair.
The 2003 US Open champion argues that Nadal preparing in Palm Springs a week before the exhibition showed that Nadal was sincere about wanting to play in Indian Wells.
"He was in Palm Springs for a week before that, not because he cared about playing in the exhibition, it's because he cared about playing in Palm Springs. Got there, was getting used to the surface, trying to go through his paces properly."
Roddick then outlined how playing someone in an exhibition is very different from preparing to potentially play seven matches on a slow, hard court like the one in Indian Wells.
"An exo is very different. These guys put on a great show in Vegas, they did everything they had to do to make it entertaining, but that is very different than going through the best players on earth on a stickier surface."
"Because you can play two sets against someone you are friendly with when you know they are compromised too doesn't mean they are apples to apples. I think it is dumb to treat it that way."
The American has known Nadal for a long time. Roddick is likely to be a good judge of Nadal's character, and he is absolutely clear that he does not feel there was any bad intent behind the Spaniard's withdrawal from the Indian Wells Open.
Latest Comments
- Kyrgios will do anything to stay in the news.shirley19-12-2024
- A technical error.
MrMustard18-12-2024 - All that is said , all that is done. Nick has 0 grand slams wins. Everything else is hot 🥵 air.MrMustard18-12-2024
- All that is said , all that isMrMustard18-12-2024
- Kyrgios is a jerk.shirley17-12-2024
- If Jessica Pegula had to undergo such horror for using a bannes substance, so do these two tennis players. Penalty should apply to all players regardless of their excuses. They are professionals and know better!!
Stella112-12-2024 - All players should be treated the same for taking banned substances, if your no 1 in the world or no 300 man or woman you should not be allowed to keep playing,,VPH108-12-2024
- Ah, censored again. No one gets to read my comment. LOLjjluvsports08-12-2024
- Reynolds, could you list all the wars started by the U.S. and U.K., or will you run out of paper? Hypocrisy.jjluvsports06-12-2024
- IDK, it looks like to me that Raducanu should praise herself and her team for 'gaming the system' as in playing the points and ranking game. When you look at her season of wild cards, skipping tournaments (including the Paris Olympics!), retiring from losing matches and avoiding qualifying rounds, it seems like there was some plan to move up the ranks without actually playing a lot of tennis. And it worked! Congrats!RealityCheckers04-12-2024